This article examines the linguistic processes through which a projected event (that is, an event that a group of spokespersons alleges will occur in the future) is constructed within factual discourse. Critical linguistic analysis is used to examine the New York Times and Washington Post coverage of the 1990 Persian Gulf conflict. This study makes two contributions. First, it expands on work in critical linguistics by explicating how a projected event is constructed as a discrete and autonomous event unfolding in the social world. Second, this study demonstrates how the political interests underlying the newspaper accounts were “naturalized” through linguistic transformations that constructed politically situated assertions as unmediated and presupposed information. This study is important for understanding the constructive nature of language practices because it demonstrates how seemingly arhetorical linguistic constructions can be examined for their rhetorical features, features that play an important role in actively constructing representations of the social world.
Dunmire, P. (1997). Naturalizing the Future in Factual Discourse. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014002003
Dunmire, Patricia. 1997. “Naturalizing the Future in Factual Discourse”. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014002003.
Dunmire, P. Naturalizing the Future in Factual Discourse. Sage, 1 Apr. 1997, doi:10.1177/0741088397014002003.