Reply to N. Van Wyck's Comment on “Two Paleoproterozoic (Statherian) Siliciclastic Metasedimentary Sequences in Central Wisconsin: The End of the Penokean Orogeny and Cratonic Stabilization of the Southern Lake Superior Region" [Precambrian Res. 157 (2007) 188–202]

Department of Geology
  1. Open Access Kent State
  2. Reply to N. Van Wyck's Comment on “Two Paleoproterozoic (Statherian) Siliciclastic Metasedimentary Sequences in Central Wisconsin: The End of the Penokean Orogeny and Cratonic Stabilization of the Southern Lake Superior Region" [Precambrian Res. 157 (20
Author(s)
Format
Article
Identifier(s)
10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2008.04.006
Publication Date
2008-07-30
Publication Title
Elsevier Science
Volume
164
Issue
3-4
First Page
236
Last Page
238
Community
Department of Geology
Recommended Citation
Medaris, L G; Dott, R H; Singer, B S; Van Schmus, W R; Holm, Daniel (2008). Reply to N. Van Wyck's Comment on “Two Paleoproterozoic (Statherian) Siliciclastic Metasedimentary Sequences in Central Wisconsin: The End of the Penokean Orogeny and Cratonic Stabilization of the Southern Lake Superior Region" [Precambrian Res. 157 (2007) 188–202]. Elsevier Science 164(3-4) 236-238. doi: 10.1016/J.PRECAMRES.2008.04.006. Retrieved from https://oaks.kent.edu/geolpubs/174