Skip to main content
Kent State University Home

Open Access Kent State (OAKS)

  • About
    • About
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Rights and Reuse
  • Browse
    • Authors
    • Collections
    • Communities
    • Subjects
  • Login

Malicious Intent? A new look at the July Crisis of 1914

Division of Research and Sponsored Programs
  1. Open Access Kent State
  2. Conferences & Events
  3. Undergraduate Research Symposium
  4. 2019 - Kent State University Undergraduate Symposium on Research, Scholarship and Creative Activity
  5. Malicious Intent? A new look at the July Crisis of 1914
Author(s)
  • Joseph McNeely
Abstract

The traditional view is that, of the powers involved in the crisis, Britain was the only one that made a substantive proposal to defuse it. Specifically: Britain proposed a multilateral conference at which the antagonists could compose their differences; Germany, in not backing the proposal, blithely ignored the only real opportunity to resolve the crisis peacefully.

My research shows that, on the contrary, it was the proposal itself that in fact ratcheted up tensions.

This proposal was rooted in a conversation between Sergei Sazonov, the Russian foreign minister, and Sir William Buchanan, the British ambassador to Russia, on July 25 Sazonov told Buchanan that the crisis, in his view, was not a local affair between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, but that it was an issue in which all European powers had standing.

Buchanan then relayed this conversation to his superior, Sir Edward Grey who was the British Foreign Secretary. Grey seizes upon the Russia idea for a conference and decides to make the proposal himself. With Grey proposing the conference, Britain turned the crisis from a crisis between Austria-Hungary and Serbia into a European Crisis. But was Sazonov’s and thereby Grey’s reading of the document correct? In my opinion, no. Using documents from the British Foreign Office, as well as the Five Power Memorandum, I aim to show how Britain escalated the crisis instead of diffusing it.

Format
Conference Proceeding
Publication Date
2019-04-09
Contributor(s)
Faculty Mentor
Dr. Ralph
Subject
  • Diplomatic History
Community
Division of Research and Sponsored Programs
Modified Abstract

The traditional view is that, of the powers involved in the crisis, Britain was the only one that made a substantive proposal to defuse it. Specifically: Britain proposed a multilateral conference at which the antagonists could compose their differences; Germany, in not backing the proposal, blithely ignored the only real opportunity to resolve the crisis peacefully.

My research shows that, on the contrary, it was the proposal itself that in fact ratcheted up tensions.

Using documents from the British Foreign Office, as well as the Five Power Memorandum on Serbia from 1909, I aim to show how Britain escalated the crisis instead of diffusing it.

  • Research Outline.docx
  • Conference Powerpoint.pptx
  • Facebook
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Pinterest
  • Email
Open Access Kent State
University Libraries

Street Address

1125 Risman Dr.
Kent, OH 44242

Mailing Address

P.O. Box 5190
Kent, OH 44242-0001

Contact Us

  • oaks [at] kent [dot] edu

Quick Links

  • About
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Rights and Reuse

Information

  • Accessibility
  • Annual Security Reports
  • Emergency Information
  • For Our Alumni
  • For the Media
  • Health Services
  • Jobs & Employment
  • May 4th, 50th Commemoration
  • Privacy Statement
  • Website Feedback
Kent State University Home
© 2021 Kent State University All rights reserved.